Godfatherism, a phenomenon where powerful individuals exert influence over politicians and governance, has long plagued Nigeria’s democracy. This practice undermines democratic principles, prioritizing personal interests over the greater good and perpetuating a culture of patronage where loyalty is exchanged for power and protection.
Historically, godfather figures have shaped political landscapes worldwide, from Chicago’s Mayor Richard J. Daley to Italy’s Christian Democrat leaders. In Nigeria, notable godfathers included Obafemi Awolowo, Nnamdi Azikiwe, and Ahmadu Bello, who wielded significant influence during the country’s formative years.
In contemporary Nigeria, godfatherism has manifested in various forms, including Rabiu Kwankwaso and Abdullahi Umar Ganduje in Kano State, Danjuma Goje and Inuwa Yahaya in Gombe State, Bukola Saraki and Shuaibu Lawal in Kwara State, Mallam Nasir El-rufai and Governor Uba Sani in Kaduna State. These relationships often end in acrimony, highlighting the fleeting nature of godfatherism in Nigerian politics.
Godfatherism cripples Nigeria’s democratic process by fostering corruption, electoral manipulation, and violence. By controlling access to resources and power, godfathers undermine election legitimacy and the rule of law, leading to widespread disillusionment and eroding trust in institutions and leaders.
Nyesom Wike’s rise to power defied established godfathers, challenging Dr. Peter Odili, Chibuike Amaechi, and former First Lady Patience Jonathan. However, his relationship with Sim Fubara exposes the fragility of godfatherism. The crisis surrounding Wike and Fubara threatens peace, unity, stability, and development in Rivers State.
The political crisis in Rivers State has taken a complex turn with recent court judgments further fueling the turmoil. The crisis stems from the rift between Governor Nyesom Wike and Sim Fubara, his preferred successor. However, their relationship has soured, leading to a bitter power struggle.
Conflicting court judgments are fueling the political crisis in Rivers State, particularly concerning the local government elections. A recent court ruling barred INEC from releasing the voters’ register to the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission for the polls. This development has heightened tensions and uncertainty in the state.
The conflicting judgments have created confusion and raised concerns about the legitimacy of the electoral process. While one court ordered the elections to proceed as planned, another restrained INEC from participating, casting a shadow over the exercise’s credibility.
Compounding the issue, the Nigerian police have cited court orders as the reason for their inability to provide security for the elections, further escalating tensions. This lack of security presence has created an environment conducive to violence and intimidation, undermining the integrity of the electoral process.
The situation in Rivers State is a stark reminder of the challenges facing Nigeria’s electoral system and the need for urgent reforms to prevent similar crises in the future. As the state teeters on the brink of instability, it is essential for all stakeholders to prioritize dialogue and finding a peaceful resolution to the crisis.
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s recent directive to the Inspector General of Police to safeguard council secretariats and local government chairmen is a welcome development in addressing the escalating tensions in Rivers State. This move demonstrates his commitment to upholding democracy and protecting public institutions.
As a democrat who overcame significant obstacles to become President, Tinubu’s intervention is crucial in resolving the crisis. Tinubu’s leadership is being tested, and his actions will shape the future of Nigeria’s democracy.
The President must continue to prioritize dialogue and cooperation, as evident in his negotiation with organized labor on a new national minimum wage. By doing so, he can cement democracy as Nigeria’s way of life and ensure that the country remains on the path to prosperity and growth.
In conclusion, the political crisis in Rivers State, fueled by conflicting court judgments and security concerns, demands urgent attention from President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and all stakeholders. The situation threatens the very foundations of Nigeria’s democracy, underscoring the need for swift and decisive action.
Ultimately, resolving the Rivers State crisis requires a collective effort, embracing dialogue, and putting the nation’s interests above personal or partisan agendas. President Tinubu’s leadership will be pivotal in charting a peaceful and democratic course for Nigeria.
By addressing this crisis, he can reaffirm his commitment to democratic principles, bolster public trust, and pave the way for a more stable and prosperous future for all Nigerians. The world watches as Nigeria navigates this critical juncture, and a successful resolution will resonate as a testament to the strength of its democracy.
As Nigeria navigates its complex political landscape, confronting godfatherism is crucial for a more equitable, democratic future.
Danaudi, Public Affairs Analyst writes from Bauchi Via [email protected]